Matt's Meandering Meditations

Legalized Gambling

2009-03-30T10:12:00.006-05:00

Today while teaching about the Middle Ages we discussed the advent of insurance as part of a business model. One of the reasons why I consider myself a pretty good teacher is I have a way of explaining things to the students in a way they can understand by using widely known analogies. To help explain insurance I describe it as gambling. Businesses before heading out on an trade excursion would insure their goods for their value and would pay in exchange a nominal fee. If anything should happen to the goods on the way - a boat sinks, the caravan is robbed by bandits - the business would receive in cash the value of the goods lost. I apply the same idea of insurance to commonly insured things today: cars, homes, health. I also explain that we are essentially betting against ourselves. We are betting that we are going to get into a car accident, that something is going to happen to our home, or we are going to get sick. We are convinced that we cannot afford to NOT be insured if ever something should happen, and for most, that is correct. Besides that, you cannot own a house or a car without insurance. So we pay a nominal fee and hope that nothing happens. Most of the time we take precautions to prevent actually using that insurance.

But if we were to deliberately create the need to collect the insurance we would be arrested for fraud. We are forced to pay the money and then we are not even allowed to throw the game. Sure, in sports, if an athlete bets against himself and then deliberately loses that is illegal and would get the athlete in a world of trouble with their athletic association. Hence Pete Rose is still in trouble with MLB.

So here we are, forced to buy insurance, sometimes more coverage than we want (especially in the case of brand new car) and do whatever we can to prevent filing a claim while the insurance companies continue to collect the premiums and pay out far less. And when they lose on their risky ventures, when they gamble with the premiums paid to it by the insured, they get bailed out with our tax dollars! But if we lose out and something goes wrong and actually need to make a substantial claim on our insurance policy, we are punished, our rates increase and may even find ourselves dropped by the provider.

So as a citizen I am supposed to accept the double standard that an insurance company can gamble, lose, and be forgiven AND be given a bonus (assumedly for securing the bailout money from the government) while the person paying for the insurance policy can be forced to gamble, WIN, and be punished?

When else are the losers rewarded and the winners punished? (So much for capitalism or is it exactly like capitalism? I am so confused!)

Karma, Dharma and Justice

2009-03-23T09:30:00.010-05:00

One of the funniest lines in a movie comes from the 1989 movie "Lethal Weapon 2" occurs when Sgt. Roger Murtaugh (Danny Glover) tells the South African Consulate worker that he wants to go to South Africa to stand with his black brothers and fight against their white oppressors:

Roger Murtaugh: How you doin'?

[his handshake is ignored by the Envoy]

Consulate Envoy: I think there must be some mistake.

Roger Murtaugh: Say what?

Consulate Envoy: Listen to your friend here, he knows what he's talking about. I don't think you want to go to South Africa.

Roger Murtaugh: Why not?

Consulate Envoy: Because you're black!

Leo Getz: [to Murtaugh] You are.

Leo Getz: [to Envoy] He is.

Absolutely hilarious in its delivery, in fact, we still joke with that line today. And yet it is of course not a joke at all. When the movie was made, South Africa was dealing with the very serious question of Apartheid. It was clear that apartheid could no longer survive in South Africa (or anywhere for that matter) and the world joined forces against the racist system to help bring equality to Africans in South Africa. Nelson Mandela, Desmond Tutu, F.W. de Klerk, among other helped to pave the way for a new government in South Africa, one based on more equitable terms for people of all races. This could not have been as successful had it not been for the efforts of the individuals involved and for the support shown by the world in demanding an end to the racist system. I even remember attempts to boycott Coca-Cola because they operated in South Africa.

Today South Africa has the opportunity to stand with the world and help bring greater equality to others oppressed. Ahead of the 2010 World Cup (of Soccer), to be held in South Africa, the first held anywhere on the African Continent, world leaders in peace and many celebrities have been invited to discuss peace worldwide and the role sport can have in fostering peace.

Originally on the guest are:

Nelson Mandela, Desmond Tutu, F.W. de Klerk, Morgan Freeman, Charlize Theron, Martti Ahtisaari, His Holiness the Dalai Lama, and many others

However, the president of South Africa, Kgalema Motlanthe, refused to sign the invitation for the Dalai Lama over concerns regarding relations with China. Currently, the Dalai Lama, spiritual leader of Tibet, is living in exile, and has been since age 16. Tibet has been occupied by China since 1950 and the Dalai Lama in exile since 1959. Rumors abound of the harsh treatment of Tibetans by the Chinese government, but no official documents exist to the actual state of affairs in this Himalayan region of China.

This is South Africa's chance to stand up and put justice over politics. But without an invitiation to the Dalai Lama the peace conference is bound to fail. Already withdrawing from the conference are F.W. de Klerk and Desmond Tutu. How could a peace conference in South Africa be taken seriously without two of their most staunch supporters for peace? Some would say that it is the duty of South Africa to repay the world for the equality that the world helped them achieve. But in the very least, it is the duty of all people to see justice done. As Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote in a letter from a Birmingham jail, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

"SA to Host First Ever Peace Conference" (The Citizen, February 25, 2009)

"Football for Peace" (FIFA.com, February 25, 2009)

"Dalai Lama Denied Visa for South Africa Peace Conference" (CNN.com, March 23, 2009)

"South Africa Bars Dalai Lama from Peace Conference" (Yahoo!News, March 23, 2009

Gangland

2009-03-01T11:32:00.004-05:00

It seems the Triangle is not immune to the blight of gangs and their violence. Television storylines are making headlines in the newspaper. Witnesses are being intimidated and parents of young witnesses are not allowing their children to come forward to give testimony that would surely put serious criminals behind bars. Who could blame them? Once the felon is behind bars, and the police and prosecutors are gone, who will protect them?

The problem is not with the parents, their reaction is logical. The problem is not with the children who are not allowed to testify by their parents. The problem is the system. Not the criminal justice system, mind you, but with the socio-economic system. And it is not likely to get better for a while. An often ignored side-effect of economic difficulty is crime. Sure, the news is always reporting on job loss and unemployment, inflation (or deflation), gas prices, foreclosures. But not a word has been mentioned about crime rates.

As I discussed in "Get a Job" (December 13, 2005) and in "More Children Left Behind" (October 3, 2006), the problem starts at home. But let us not be too quick to blame the family. Parents often times have to make a very difficult decision - making ends meet or being more present with their children. What often times exacerbates the problem is the entire absence of a parent leaving the responsibility to fall on only one. The parent who chooses to take two jobs, work many and long hours spends little time with their children. Often times, these families can only afford to live in lower-income neighborhoods that tend to attract "bad elements." No matter how "tough" a particular child may be, he or she is still a child and still craves certain necessities. They need guidance, they need to feel like they are part of a family. And what often substitutes are gangs. In a gang, members feel a sense of belonging. They feel that they are being protected and others are watching out for them. Here one institution takes the place of another - gangs for the family.

Not enough attention is paid to the cause of the breakdown of the family. Too often society will blame the individuals, and in some cases, I would agree. But for it to be happening on such a large scale, it must be more, it must be systemic. What government should be asked to do is get to the root of the problem of the family - and it is NOT gay marriage. Why is it that so many children must be raised by a one parent home without support? Inadequate or no health care? Our economic system has been notorious through its history for leaving segments of the population behind. It has taken large movements and controversial exposes to get government to take notice. It has worked for child labor laws, for unsafe working conditions. What will it take for Congress to notice this large segment of the population that feeds the gangs with new recruits? Instead of treating the symptom, let's get to the heart of the problem, and solve it there.

Gang Threats Scare Off Witnesses (The News and Observer - newsobserver.com) March 1, 2009

Beijing Blackout

2008-08-09T21:56:00.000-05:00

Yesterday, at 8pm Beijing time (8am EDT) the Olympic opening ceremonies took place. And here, in the United States they could not be seen on the networks that paid for the exclusive rights to broadcast the Olympics in the United States, NBC. Fortunately I had forgotten yesterday morning in the regular bustle of getting Evan ready for school, because if I had remembered to tune in I would have been angry and disappointed (as it is, I tuned in last night to catch the tape of the broadcast to be angered and disappointed that I had to listen to Bob Costas while the ceremonies were taking place). What sense does that make to delay the broadcast of the Olympic opening ceremonies by 12 hours!?!? Well to the average person who wants to watch them with the rest of the world, it make no sense. But from a business perspective and a marketing perspective, it makes plenty of sense. NBC guaranteed that the ceremonies would only be broadcast in the US at a specific time, guaranteeing a maximum number of viewers at a set time. In doing so, they could charge more for advertising during the commercial spots. It is the same adage, "Profits over People." NBC doesn't care if the citizens of the United States get to see things as they happen around the world, instead we are preempted, censored if you will, in the interests of profits. And we complain about censorship in China.

American Fans Angered by Olympic Ceremony TV Blackout (Yahoo! News)

I did not watch the entire ceremony, but what I saw was pretty impressive. The Chinese spared no expense. And the effects were spectacular!

A Crime so Monstrous

2008-08-07T22:24:00.005-05:00

A few months ago I read heard a news story about a new book titled A Crime so Monstrous: Face-to-Face with Modern-Day Slavery. After hearing the interview with the author, report E. Benjamin Skinner, I knew I had to read this book. I went out and bought it the day it hit the book stores. Listen for yourself (from the NPR program "Day to Day"):

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88102060

This book was not disappointing, well worth reading and the $25 I spent on it. This was something had never spent much time thinking about because it is not something I realized happened in such numbers. According to the author, there are more slaves in the world now than at any other time in human history. Even more astounding is that there are more slaves being brought into the United States today than there were in pre-Independence America! Today, when we talk about slavery, the first thing that usually comes to mind is sex slaves - mail order brides from eastern Europe and such. But sex slavery is a small portion of the slavery that takes place. Most slaves are laborers, either domestic or industrial, whose condition is the result of a former debt. Sometimes that debt was as small as 79 cents, and today, two generations later, the family is still working to pay off such a minuscule debt.

Today I watched a very touching movie, Trade. In this film, a boy from Mexico City, struggles to track down his 13 year old sister who was kidnapped by a sex trafficking ring. Kevin Kline, a Texas detective gets involved and and helps the boy try and find his sister. The story is pure tragedy. Will they find the girl? It doesn't matter, there is no happy ending even if they do find her. This is an on going problem in the world and the rescue of one person, as significant as it may be, is still insignificant when compared to the atrocious crimes perpetrated in the slave trade. But we know, slavery is not a new institution. It has been going on for thousands of years. At no time in human history has there been a period without slavery. And what is more, the reasons for slavery remain the same. I very much urge you to watch this movie and read this book. It will put genocide into an entirely new light - one even darker than before.

The Power of Good

2008-05-16T11:08:00.009-05:00

During a time of profound evil, it is easy to focus on the bad and forget about the good. The Holocaust of World War II was one such time. While Hitler and his Nazi sympathizers were performing horrendous acts of brutality against minorities, such as Jews, gypsies, and homosexuals, to name a few, there were still some people who recognized the evil and did what they could to battle it.

I was made aware of the bold and courageous acts of Sir Nicholas Winton during a workshop about the Holocaust and Genocide. Nicholas Winton was a stock broker in England before WWII. Despite the depression his job provided him with a certain degree of wealth. In December 1938, Winton left for a skiing trip in Switzerland, which he never made. Instead, during his stop in Prague, he found refugees by the thousands, all homeless ahead of the Nazi "invasion" of Czechoslovakia. Instead of ignoring the issue as "someone else's problem," he took charge and set to work straight away to rescue as many children as possible from the terrible tragedy that was unfolding. By the time Germany invaded Poland in September, 1939 marking the beginning of WWII, Winton had rescued 669 children. He packed up all his work, for there was nothing else he could do, joined the RAF (Royal Air Force) and served his country. This chapter in his life was closed.

More than 40 years later, his wife stumbled across a steamer trunk in the attic. Upon opening it, she discovered pictures, scrapbooks, documents, official stamps of both Great Britain and Nazi Germany. What she unlocked was the chapter of Winton's life that he had all but forgotten about. When asked about these items, he simply dismissed it as something he felt he needed to do at the time and then it was done.

But it is not done. Winton's efforts in rescuing these 669 children has resulted in thousands of people today who can thank him for their life - the children and grand children of those saved from the holocaust. The video(which I own), The Power of Good, is an incredible documentary about Nicholas Winton and his work to save the Jewish children of Prague before World War II. At the website, you can view a 6 minute clip of the one hour video. It tells about Winton, now 98, and his work and dedication. About how he was honored decades later for work that he felt was necessary, that he undertook, not for recognition, but just to do good.

The Power of Good: The Nicholas Winton Story
Nicholas Winton, Rescuer of Jews

This week, Irene Sendler, another individual who did immense good during this time of evil, passed away. She was also 98. She smuggled 2,500 children out of Nazi-occupied Warsaw, at great risk to her own life. At times, her own life was in danger, especially after she was arrested for being a Jewish sympathizer. She was repeatedly tortured and beaten to give up the names of others involved in the operation. She did not give up any names and was rescued by way of a bribe and, undeterred, continued her work, but under a different name.

A Pole Who Saved 2,500 Jews, Dies
Polish Holocaust Hero Dies at Age 98

It is amazing how we overlook the good and focus on the bad. We become so preoccupied by the evil that we sometimes fail to recognize the efforts of people who step up in those desperate times. These are only two people who helped, but how many countless others go unrecognized?

Gas Tax Takes a Holiday

2008-05-02T07:46:00.012-05:00

18 - that is amount (in cents) of the federal gas tax per gallon.

16 - that is the number of gallons of gasoline my minivan holds.

2.88 - the amount of money I stand to save on every COMPLETE fill-up of my gas tank.

15 - the number of weeks, and consequently, the number of times I will fill-up (once per week), during the federal gas tax holiday.

43.20 - the amount of money I will save from the federal gas tax holiday.

Ah, what a relief. I will save nearly $45 dollars this summer is the federal gas tax is suspended from Memorial Day until Labor Day. Essentially, almost one "free" tank of gas, assuming the price does not continue to rise, which, unfortunately, it is certain to do. Is this really worth it? What can a consumer do with the extra $11 per month? What could the government do with the extra $11 per month per car on the road? What the consumer is overlooking is the fact that the federal government uses that money to dole out to states in order to have projects to build and repair national highways. Without that money roads will be in worse shape nd jobs will be lost. No thank you. I do not mind paying $11 per month per car (I have 2 cars, so $22 per month) if it will help the economy, if it will keep hundreds (many thousands?) of people in my state employed and keep roads in a somewhat decent condition. Is that a liberal idea? I don't think so, it is a smart idea.

What is more, the presidential hopefuls have sounded off on this issue of a federal gas tax holiday: McCain in favor, Clinton in favor, Obama opposed. I know that this is a single issue but I see it as more. To me, this is symbolic of the way each of these candidates will serve as our Chief Executive. The average perosn who does not take the time to actually consider the minimal impact of the 18 cent tax holiday will think that this is a wonderful idea, "hey, wow, it will lower gas prices!" But isn't that the way Washington has worked for decades (maybe even longer)? "Let's make the people we are helping them with this little thing while we hoodwink them with something else." It is their position in this type of maneuver that makes me believe that Barack Obama will be a different president. I believe that he will not play as many games with the people and actually work more for the average person. I believe that he will accept that the American citizen is intelligent enough to see through the Washington games and so not play them. Some argue that he does not possess the experience as a McCain and a Clinton. Maybe not, but maybe that can be an advantage. We have had YEARS of the same self-serving, Washington, politics beginning with as far back as I can remember, and maybe even farther (with the exception of perhaps of Jimmy Carter whose unwillingness to play along with the Washington status quo killed his chances at reelection).

To Boycott or Not to Boycott, that Is the Question

2008-04-11T21:47:00.012-05:00

It has long been established that China is notorious for their human rights abuses. For years the United States relationship with China had been cold, and all the time the government argued that it was about human rights violations, the treatment of their people. But that chilly attitude changed once China began to open its doors to aspects of free trade. The United States saw an opportunity and seized it! The most populous nation in the world without protections for workers is a perfect place to do business. Think of all the costs that can be cut and all the profits that can be made! Very exciting for those with interests in the business world. But if you have an interest in people, then look away because things here are not so pretty.

When I think of China and human rights two things come to mind: 1) Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989 and 2) China's invasion and occupation of Tibet in 1950.

On June 8, 1989, I was on my way to pick up my tuxedo for my prom the next day. It was an event I had looked forward to for four years. The limousines were rented, the plans for after the prom were to go to either Emerald City (a dance club in NYC) or a comedy club, also in NYC. And afterwards, crash at a friends house to kick off a nice relaxing weekend. The day after the prom, my girlfriend and I went out on her boat along with another couple from the prom. It was a great day. But at the same time, on the opposite side of the world, students my age were not having such a nice weekend. They were peacefully protesting to have a few freedoms. They wanted their government to loosen up the tight control on speech. They wanted some right to religion. And yet, I, a naive teenager, aged 18, was taking for granted the freedoms that these Chinese students were asking for. But this protest was "getting out of hand." There were too many people protesting peacefully. The idea might spread, and that just could not happen.

On April 15, 1989, Hu Yaobang died. A Communist Party elite who oversaw the drastic makeover of the Party during the years 1982-1986, was viewed by the many in China as the major figure for reform. Upon his death, the many students gathered in Tiananmen Square to gain audience at the Great Hall of the People in order to request social and political changes. Their attempt to be heard was never granted and viewed by the students as a snub. As a result, overnight, many independent student organizations formed in cities throughout the countries, and some even clashed with police. But despite what appeared to be the beginning of a movement, Party leadership believed that it would all blow over the memorial service for Hu Yaobang on April 22. This estimate was incorrect and the movement would be discussed among the Party leaders as "turmoil" with the same negative connotation as the "turmoil" of the upheavals during the Cultural Revolutions of 1966-1969. At this point, the Party could not turn back from its course. It had denied audience to the students and now that the movement had grown, giving in to the protesters would be a sign of weakness in the Party, and would therefore send the message to other groups that protesting would help to get your way. Not a message the Party would advocate.

As the protests continued into and throughout May, the patience of the Chinese government grew shorter as they became anxious to end this before the arrival of Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. The students saw Gorbachev as a symbol for reform and by the beginning of June, the government had run out of options. They brought in the troops who would later be ordered to end the protests by force.

This is a single example of the Chinese treatment of their people. One that hits home to me once I put it into perspective, that I was attending my prom while they were facing off with tanks. Today we are seeing another such protest and reaction from the same Chinese government. Sure the names of the leaders re different, but the Party is the same. In 1950 China invaded and occupied the independent nation of Tibet. By 1959, Tibet would lose it's "autonomous" status and clearly unwillingly be a part of China with the exile of the Dalai Lama to India (for an amazing movie about these events, watch the Martin Scorsese film, Kundun). Since that day, the political and spiritual leader of Tibet, the Dalai Lama, has been unable to return for fear of his life. He has been helping to guide his people from India.

On a personal note, I have read some of the writing of the Dalai Lama and read about his history. I am infinitely impressed by his steadfastness and devotion to peace. I can not a imagine a single person that would blame or fault him if he decided to show anger or advocate violence against China considering what the people of Tibet have been subject to. But instead, his perseverance, courage, and calm have been an inspiration. From reading interviews and teachings, I have become a new person, he has totally helped me improve the person I once was to who I am today (I am not saying that I couldn't stand to improve some more, but I believe that I am a better person now than I was 8-10 years ago).

Today, the people of Tibet are once again struggling against the Chinese regime - demonstrating for independence. But the Chinese government continues its crackdown on the protesters who are not limited to Tibet, but to other neighboring provinces as well. And as this protest spreads, Beijing may be faced with some serious problems in the run up to this year's Olympic Games in Beijing. Many world leaders are already planning to boycott the Games, while many others have yet to decide. "President" Bush insists that he will honor his commitment to the invitation to attend the Olympic Games claiming that there would be more to gain be keeping the dialog open between the two leaders (Bush and Hu Jintao). His view is that a boycott would make the Chinese leader more reluctant to listen to the President and any discussion about human rights. So the question remains, would there be mo to gain from boycotting or attending the Olympics?

Economically, the United States has much to gain by keeping in the good graces of China - potentially the largest market in the world. In addition to being a source of cheap labor and cheap goods, China also holds an abundance of US currency. This could be very bad for the US dollar. Remember, since the $US is backed by faith in its value, all China need do is demand yuan (the Chinese currency) for $US. This would result in a devaluation of the dollar and an increase the rate of inflation experienced by Americans.

Last week, as the Olympic torch made its appearance in San Francisco during its brief visit to the US, it was to be met by many protesters. But the heavily guarded torch procession took an alternate route in order to avoid the concentration of demonstrator for fear that it would encounter the same resistance as it did in London and Paris. But when I saw pictures of the armed escort the torch received I was hard pressed to tell the difference between the United States and a police state. What have we been reduced to as a nation? Do we live in such fear that we must have such a presence for a procession to honor the Olympic torch? Or, has our xenophobia taken us so far that we should now even fear those sworn to protect us?

Police Escort in San Francisco

Police in China

With regard to the history of the Olympics. Every four years in ancient Greece, the finest athletes from all of the city-states would get together in the spirit of competition in the city of Argos. These athletic events were to honor the king of the gods, Zeus. The pan-Hellenic games were the ultimate sign of goodwill between the competing cities as every city-state pledged a ceasefire of any hostilities for at least the duration of the games. Today, the ideal of worldwide good will continues to exist as the athletes compete together and recognize their similarities as athletes and put aside their differences as, perhaps, political enemies. Yet we rarely live up to that ideal. And it is made even more difficult to hold this ideal high when the very host country continues to hold an entire nation prisoner, as it does to Tibet. When this happens the spirit of the games is lost and it becomes nothing more than spectacle. A game without meaning.

"I decided it is better to scream. This pitiful sound, which sometimes, goodness knows how, reaches into the remotest prison cell, is a concentrated expression of the last vestige of human dignity. It is a man's way of leaving a trace, of telling people how he lived and died. By his screams he asserts his right to live, sends a message to the outside world demanding help and calling for resistance. If nothing else is left, one must scream. Silence is the real crime against humanity."
- Nadezhda Mandelstam

"Recession" is a 4-Letter Word

2008-04-04T09:46:00.014-05:00

Jobless claims: Highest since Katrina (CNNMoney.com)

The Great Inflation Cover-up (CNNMoney.com-Fortune)

Fed official: Economy 'all but stalled' (CNNMoney.com)

80,000 job losses, unemployment spikes (CNNMoney.com)

On March 26, 2008, "President" Bush visited a small business in Sterling, Virginia where he promoted his economic stimulus package (see speech "President Bush Visits ColorCraft of Virginia, Inc., Discusses Stimulus Package, Economy"). At no point did he mention that horrible word "recession." He did however refer to the economy as enduring a "downturn" and even a "rough patch", but he is "confident in the long term we'll come out stronger than ever before." And that the best way to do this is "to give people their money back so they can spend it." Admittedly, "it's going to take a while for the economy to feel the effects" but until then we can "rest assured" that "in the long term we'll come out stronger than ever before."

Oh, is that so, Mr. "President"? How can you explain to the 7.815 million people now unemployed to be patient because in the long term things will be better? "Oh, don't worry. I know the banks have foreclosed on your home and you can no longer make ends meet, but if you wait until, say, 2010, it will all be OK. At that time the housing crisis will be over and the economy will be better. And it will all be the result of this 'good law that I signed.'"

The data below show the rate of inflation since 2001 as well as the rate if unemployment over the last 13 months from the Bureau of Labor Statistics latest information.

According to this information, the rate of inflation has been increasing since 2001. That is to say, the buying power of the $US has been falling at an increasing rate. Or, prices have been rising faster and faster each year. It has been argued that if we focus only on "Core Inflation" (the rate of inflation without the volatile fuel and food market) that the rates are not at all alarming. So in other words, if we tell the consumer that if you don't buy fuel to run your car or heat your home, and if you don't buy food, then your should be 'OK' and won't feel the full effects of inflation. Economists who use only core inflation to measure the rate of inflation are ignoring the human factor of the economy - these are essential items to human consumption. And if an economist ignores the human factor then EVERY economic model can be thrown out since they are all based on how consumers will make their economic decisions. This is when economics as a science becomes irrelevant. The only way it can remain relevant is if economists remember the source of all economic data are the consumers and the tendencies of consumers when they make economic choices. The study of economics for its own sake is pointless. (Which can be said of any social science - social sciences must be studied in a way that makes it relevant to the student - but that is a discussion for another day.)

But if we combine the increasing rate of inflation with the increasing rate of unemployment we have a larger problem - stagflation (see the March 20, 2008 posting on "The Average Day" titled "Stagflation"). But what does the Unemployment Rate measure? Simply, it is the number of people who are "out of work." That definition is insufficient. It may lead people to believe that includes children, retired persons, stay-at-home moms, and disabled people. Unemployment only measures the portion of the population who are eligible, able, and desiring work - the "Workforce". So a 52 year old man who has decided to give up looking for work is not considered part of the workforce even if he is healthy and has bills to pay. Since he is no longer actively seeking employment, he is not considered part of the workforce. What is also deceiving is the exclusion of the "underemployed." Underemployed consists of people who are forced to take work that is below their qualification and experience. For example, the same 52 year old man has a PhD in Aerospace Engineering yet his company has downsized and cut his division. He must now compete with equally qualified individuals younger than himself. The big difference is that he will command a higher salary than those 20-25 years his junior and so becomes less marketable. In addition, working against him is his age and potential health risk, which again ups the overall cost of a firm to hire this worker. As a result, this individual may be forced to take a job for which he is overqualified - anything from, in the worst case scenario, retail at a department store, to perhaps store manager. Is this person employed? Yes he is. Is he commanding the salary he deserves based on his experience and training? Not at all. Again, leaving out the human element to economics.

But "Recession?" Not us, not now. What is the "President" doing to head off this "rough patch?" Giving everyone who files their taxes this year $600 dollars! Now that is a reason to celebrate! Isn't it? Why don't you look any happier? Oh, yes, I know, fuel prices are continuing to rise and that $600 will simply be eaten up in fuel costs. Oh, that's OK. That is money you would have spent on fuel anyway, right? But look on the bright side, if own stock in one of the Big 5 oil companies you will earn greater dividends. Now that is something to celebrate. (See post "April Fools'! The Joke Is on the Consumer")

If we admit that we are in a "recession" then how would that look for the President? How would that look for our economic leader? How will that tarnish his legacy as president?

For more anti-Bush paraphernalia, visit http://www.cafepress.com/thewhitehouse.

April Fools'! The Joke is on the Consumer

2008-04-01T14:49:00.012-05:00

At hearing, Big Oil says its profits aren't extreme (USA Today)
Congress has big questions for Big Oil (Yahoo! News)

In order for the argument of Big Oil to make sense, you have to agree with the basic premise: Profits of $124 Billion is not extreme.

Are you kidding me? Not extreme? $124 Billion ranks 61st among the GDP of nations of the world. In other words, the profits made by the five major US oil producers is better than that of 170 other nations of the world. But this is just profits. Let's take a look at each of the Big 5's Revenues and some corresponding statistics I put together:

Remembering that GDP is the combined value of all goods and services produced in a given nation for a given year, the Big 5 Oil Companies account for 10.43% of the USA's GDP for 2007! In terms of production among nations of the world, according to the CIA World Factbook, the Big 5 would rank 13th in the world, behind Italy, but just ahead of Spain. Their production would make up just over half of Germany's GDP and is greater than Mexico and Canada.

Keep in mind that profit is the amount of revenue left over after all bills and expenses are paid, including salaries and dividends to shareholders, why should our government have a problem cutting the amount of subsidies given to these companies? It seems to me that they are earning enough to cover any investment into expanding fuel sources as well as into finding cleaner and alternative sources.

According to the articles above, oil supplies have been holding steady, so the argument of a "shortage" doesn't hold water. Where is all this money going? Remember, a subsidy is a government grant of money to a business or corporation to encourage a type of production, be it research or investment in production. Where does government get the money to pay these subsidies? Taxes, our taxes. So, not only are we getting gouged at the pump, our taxes are also going to the fuel companies instead of directly improving our life. That money goes to pay the investors of the Big 5, as well as the average $3.29 per gallon we pay at the pump.

In general, people do not like taxes. But, if taxes are collected, it is accepted that as citizens we should see a benefit from those taxes paid in the form of government programs or services that will directly impact our lives. When taxes go subsidize already profitable corporations, it becomes difficult to see the direct benefit. In this case, we can tack on the fact that both Bush and Cheney have ties to the energy industry. To me it looks like Bush's promise to veto any legislation that makes it to his desk that cuts subsidies to the Big 5 is nothing more than payback for years of support to the White House, both before and during this administration's term.

The Price of Freedom (continued)

2007-07-10T09:17:00.000-05:00

Again, the Constitution of the United States becomes nothing more than a doormat on which to wipe your feet, thanks to the Bush administration and the support of the Courts. (See prior post of January 31, 2006, "The Price of Freedom") The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, on a 2-1 vote ordered the case to be dismissed in the District Court. The vote, along party lines (why am I not surprised), could effectively rule out any future challenges to the federal wiretapping program instituted by the "President" after 9/11. In the case of ACLU v. NSA, the plaintiffs were unable to produce evidence that they have been sufficiently harmed to justify a lawsuit against the NSA. As a result, the case must be dismissed. The problem is that a 1953 statute prohibits national security information from being released for any purpose, including the effective prosecution of court proceedings. The only way to obtain such information would be through illegal means creating a "catch-22" scenario. Essentially, this wire-tapping program can continue indefinitely, without significant court challenges as long as no plaintiff as able to secure information showing that they have been targeted and have received significant harm.

Is this the nature of the Constitution? Are these the ideals that our nation was founded on? I argue not. The 4th Amendment to the Constitution protects US citizens from "illegal searches and seizures" - as any basic civics class will teach:

Amendment 4
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

And how long will this continue? As citizens of the United States, we demand more from our government than tyranny. If we were happy with tyranny, then we would never have demanded our independence from Great Britain. Unfortunately, this is something that we will be forced to endure so long as the "war on terror" continues. And it seems, that as long as Bush or one of the "neocon" cronies get elected, it will continue for quite sometime. But it also seems that citizens of the United States are not the only ones who are dismayed at the current direction of the US government and politics. While Bush's approval ratings fall to 29% here in the US, it seems to be at 0% in Ireland. But can the current batch of political rivals vying for the presidency produce any significant changes that will bring a change to the public opinion toward the United States?

This administration has become one of hypocrisy. Here in the United States so few people can see its full extent. However it is painfully obvious abroad. US policies toward other nations are strictly capitalist and fully fascist. Where Americans tout their high ethical and moral standards to the rest of the world, a critical look at the United States will show that politicians know the theory, but refuse to put it into practice:

The United States pushes for democratic elections throughout the world, yet our "President" has been elected by the courts and the electoral college system effectively takes presidential elections out of the hands of the electorate;
Equality and fair treatment of citizens is demanded of nations around the world before the US trades with them, yet segregation exists, not specifically along racial lines, but along economic lines and is supported by the protection of big business over the worker;
Fair justice is demanded of new and burgeoning governments while the US justice system provides greater benefits for those who can afford better lawyers;
Lining up as many allies against terror is a major goal of US foreign policy, yet the United States has supplied "legitimate" governments who undertook terrorist actions against their own people.

The evidence is there but few people will read the writing on the wall. At times it seems that the greatest enemy to the people of the United States is the United States' government. Changes in policy and philosophy must be made or things will get much worse.

from the Declaration of Independence
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these
ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them
shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw
off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

And Justice for some....

2007-07-03T08:55:00.001-05:00

Yesterday, "President" Bush commuted the sentence of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby for his involvement in the leaking of the name of CIA operative Valerie Plame. This does not mean that Libby was pardoned, oh what a relief, it means that he has still been convicted but won't serve a single day in prison. So, we can rest easy that he remains the highest ranking White House official convicted since the Iran-Contra affairs of the 1980's.

On the other hand, what does this say for national security? It says that our CIA operatives who risk their lives in the field, obtaining sensitive information from around the world are no longer safe in their own country. The precedent set here is that it is "ok" to endanger CIA field operatives because even if you are convicted, according to the law, you won't have serve any jail time. This is from a "President" who so highly values national security that he:

has put this country in harms way in order to protect national security;
has sent our young men and women into battle in the name of national security;
has fought to limit civil liberties in the name of national security.

While at the same time is willing to allow his friend to walk, without punishment, for violating national security.

This is simply another example of how the "President" stole an election in order to produce profits for his friends in the corporate world (in the Industrial Military Complex) as we were warned by outgoing President Eisenhower in 1960.

And who pays the price? Cronies of the administration? Of course not, as can be seen by Libby's commuted sentence (30 months is far too long to spend in prison for violating national security!). It is paid by the tax payers who foot the bill for criminal prosecutions and 2 1/2 year trials that result in convictions and no jail time. It is paid by those men and women in the field who risk their lives for national security just to have it made a mockery of by the "President." Where is this all going? When will it end? When will those truly responsible pay the price? Where is the justice?

Check out the article: Bush Wipes Away Libby's Prison Sentence

This just in.. Bush hasn't ruled out a full pardon in the future! Travesty. Bush won't rule out full Libby pardon

Music With Meaning (vol. 2)

2007-06-17T21:01:00.000-05:00

A long while ago, my father had a juke box in the basement that would play 45 records (that's right, a record not a cd or tape!). And one song that really got me fired up was "And When I Die" by Blood, Sweat, and Tears. What I like most about the song was its tempo changes. I used to walk around the pool table (yup, full size pool table, we also had a pinball machine!) until during the slower parts and would run during the faster parts. I mean, I felt inspired to run since the song was telling me that the devil was right behind me chasing me! It was exhilarating for a 6 year old.

Today, I still like the song. No, I don't run around the pool table (in fact my father no longer has the juke box or the pinball machine - and with all the clutter in their basement these day, I'd break my leg if I tried to run around the room), but I now better appreciate the lyrics.

"And When I Die"
by Blood, Sweat, and Tears

I'm not scared of dying,
And I don't really care.
If it's peace you find in dying,
Well then let the time be near.
If it's peace you find in dying,
And if dying time is here,
Just bundle up my coffin
'Cause it's cold way down there.
I hear that its cold way down there.
Yeah, crazy cold way down there.

Chorus:

And when I die, and when I'm gone,
There'll be one child born
In this world to carry on,
to carry on.

Now troubles are many, they're as deep as a well.
I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell.
Swear there ain't no heaven and I pray there ain't no hell,
But I'll never know by living, only my dying will tell.
Yes only my dying will tell.
Yeah, only my dying will tell.

Chorus

Give me my freedom for as long as I be.
All I ask of living is to have no chains on me.
All I ask of living is to have no chains on me,
And all I ask of dying is to go naturally.
Oh I want to go naturally.

Here I go,
Hey Hey!
Here comes the devil,
Right Behind.
Look out children,
Here he comes!
Here he comes! Hey...

Don't want to go by the devil.
Don't want to go by demon.
Don't want to go by Satan,
Don't want to die uneasy.
Just let me go naturally.

and when I die,
When I'm dead, dead and gone,
There'll be one child born in our world to carry on,
To carry on.
Yeah, yeah...

I think about the words. To me, it is almost a prayer. OK, not your typical prayer, but one where we pray to go peacefully and see our way to heaven. And that when we go, there will be something beautiful left in our place - a newborn child.

The day my mother-in-law died, I turned this song up loud in the car, and sang it at the top of voice. It hurt my heart to do it, but yet I felt that I was praying for a peaceful journey for my mother-in-law to heaven.

Now, don't get me wrong, I am not a religious person; I don't pray in what would perceived as conventional ways. But I would consider myself spiritual. I find comfort in the idea of a heaven, that there is a God, and that when we die we pass on to something greater.

(Sure, this song sure does seem like a strange place to find God, eh?)

Equal Protection of the Laws

2007-05-18T21:30:00.000-05:00

Amendment 14
"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction hereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

To me the question is simple. Any law that denies any citizen of the United States rights or protections enjoyed by the majority of the people is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. This has been upheld time and time again. Surely the law that was used to end racial segregation does not stop at racial differences. As the Supreme Law of the Land, the US Constitution and its Amendments trump ANY law of Congress, Executive Order of the President, or any law of any state in the Union. As a result, any legal attempt to deny citizens the rights and privileges received through marriage by denying them the right to marry should likewise be seen as a violation of the Constitution.

As a result, the effect the Federal Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 has on denying citizens the rights and privileges of marriage is a violation of their rights as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Plain and simple. There is no room for point of view, the law is clear.

Amendment 1
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States embodies the basic and fundamental rights of a citizen living in a free society. Citizens must not be afraid to express their opinion. They must feel comfortable with their beliefs. They must not be afraid to gather in groups for political purposes. The "Establishment Clause" of the First Amendment guarantees that the government of the United States will not establish a legal, official religion for the nation. This also guarantees a person the right to not practice a religion at all.

Opponents of gay marriage argue that "marriage" is a sacred institution. It is a union of a man and a woman and consecrated by God. If that is the case, then the defense of "marriage" by any law is yet another violation of a Constitutional Amendment. As a religious institution, it can not be defined by a law of the United States, it would be up to the religious institutions to define what a marriage can, and can not be. In this light, the Federal Defnese of Marriage Act of 1996 is again shown to be unconstitutional.

Whether it is thought that "gay marriage" will "destroy the institute of marriage" and will harm "family values" is irrelevant. If Congress and politicians, and the Moral Majority or the Family Research Council or any other so-called defenders of "family values" want to attack an institution that is harming family values they should fight against the institutionalized socio-economic segregation. This segregation keeps people in poverty, drives both parents to work more than one job while leaving children to fend for themselves and to turn to surrogate institutions for acceptance. Certainly it would be better for a same-sex couple to adopt a child and show it love and give it a safe environment to grow than to have that child bounced from foster family to foster family.

More Children Left Behind

2006-10-03T21:03:00.000-05:00

In January 2002, President Bush signed into law, a bill that sets accountability higher for public school educators. The effort is to improve student performance and maintain a minimum level of achievement for all Americans as they graduate from high school. A benefit will be lower dropout rates, a more highly qualified workforce, and a more competitive economy in this ever increasing global economy.

Although this is a lofty goal, and on the surface, one worth striving for, it can not be attained in the manner in which the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law requires. According to the law, the way of measuring these goals is to test students again, and again, and again. These tests MUST be given within a set "testing window" (limited period of time to administer the test and any make-ups). But any educator knows, a student's performance on a standardized test is not an accurate indicator of their understanding of a set of curricula. In addition, where is the time for testing coming from? More time for testing means less time for instruction on the subjects and material that the students MUST be tested on.

Another concern with this approach is actually how many students ARE being left behind? As the rigors of testing increases the pace and intensity of instruction also increases. What happens to those students who before had a difficult time keeping up? These students on the margin increasingly fall in the cracks during normal instruction time. When this happens, teachers who are dedicated to their profession and their students (which they were BEFORE NCLB) are committing more of their own time to these students in afterschool and before school review/remediation sessions. Why? In the name of higher test scores, not in the name of improving the character and consitution of the student. The cost to the teacher is often the amount of time they have to spend with and support their children in their educational endeavors, thus creating more children on the margin.

But what is really keeping these students on the margin? Here is the major shortfall of NCLB.

Students normally referred to as being "on the margin" (or in danger of failing) are those who come from homes with less family support. Perhaps it is a single parent home, or home where both parents must work long hours or "3rd shfits" in order to make ends meet. The real failure in the education system is NOT the accountablility of the schools and teachers, it is the lack of accountablility on the family. The target of NCLB should not be the hardworking and dedicated teachers, it should be the family. The current economic structure of the United States does not make it possible for many segments of the population to get ahead to a point where they can afford the time to give the adequate support the children need to be successful at school. In this case, a parent must weigh the costs of providing food and shelter for their family against providing academic support for their family. When it comes down to it, in the most basic economic sense, food and shelter, as necessities, take precedence over education. When a parent has to make that decision, society has let that family down. The children of these households often find that they must spend a good deal of their own time, not on school and studies, but on taking care of younger siblings while the parents are at work trying to make ends meet. These are the students that need to be targeted by NCLB, and not at school. These children have been left behind by society and a system that allows it to continue.

How can we help these families? Do we tell them that their church or religious institution is the answer? If so, how can we make them accountable? Should government programs be the cure? Does that mean hold politicians accountable? Where does this end? In truth, we should ALL be accountable for each other. It is our society, ALL of us together. It is in the condition it is in because we allowed it to happen. If it is going to be fixed, it will be everyone's responsibility. And when that happens, we will not need to test students for every little thing, we will not have to worry about a student who is on the margin because of a lack of family support. The schools will be able to focus their attention on educating the students, not teaching a narrow curriculum. We will teach students, not courses. And in the end, we ALL will benefit.

Where were you?

2006-09-11T22:32:00.000-05:00

Where were you when you first heard the news of September 11, 2001? What were you doing? Who told you?

At 8:46 am, I was 16 minutes into 2nd period class. I had no idea of what was going down. No word had reached my ears. It was not until about an hour later, when I was walknig to the teacher lounge that a student who was standing in the doorway of another classroom said to me, "Mr. C, did you hear? A plane crashed into the twin towers." I was of course skeptical, especially it was from a student I had taught who was notorious for stretching the truth. So after a stop at the vending machine and the restroom, I was listening to the sounds coming from the open doorways of classrooms as I returned to my own. Could it be true? Had a plane actually crashed into the World Trade Center?

The first thing I did when I got back to my classroom was turn on the TV to see. Not only had a plane crashed into the World Trade Center, two planes had crashed! One into each building! This is could be no accident, could it? And there I was, sitting watching CNN in my classroom as the buildings burned. And then, the unthinkable happened, the building collapsed on itself. Despite the fact that a massive explosion had occured, it never dawned on me that the building could fall, it was, truly, unthinkable. What was left? An encore by the second tower.

Alone I sat, thinking... Is this possible? Did I know anybody there? Are they OK? Trying to call my parents in New York turned out to not be an option as all the phone lines were busy.

Where were you when you heard the news? Post a reply.

Godless???

2006-06-10T22:10:00.000-05:00

Ann Coulter. Author of books: Slander: Liberal Lies about the American Right, How to Talk to a Liberal (if You Must): The World according to Ann Coulter, and now Godless: The Church of Liberalism.

What is wrong with this person? I am so tired of this [fill in explitive here]. Does she not see what she is saying? Just the title of her book "Godless." First of all, think about it, sorry POLITICAL conservatives, you do not have a monopoly on Christianity, that was settled some 500 years ago with a little thing called the Protestant Reformation. Religion belongs to the people, ALL of them. Second, Jesus was, first and foremost, a SOCIAL LIBERAL! Everything I have learned about the subject was that he gave of himself for the benefit of others. How much? He sacrificed his life while the POLITICAL an SOCIAL conservatives sent him off to die. And why did he have to sacrifice himself? To save humanity from the debauchery of extravagance of the SOCIAL conservatives. So where these POLITICAL and SOCIAL conservatives come off claming liberals are Godless... get a clue.

Check out this article about her latest words of wisdom: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060610/ap_en_tv/quotable_coulter_7

PS: What's up with the Adam's Apple? I thought only guys had them? Just one of those "things that make you go 'hmmm.'"

Con-GRAD-ulations!

2006-05-26T08:39:00.000-05:00

Today, I am watching the "Senior Assembly" on closed circuit TV in my classroom with 28 freshmen. I am listening to speeches by the seniors about reminiscing over the years of school. Looking at these freshmen who watch in anticipation... "What will our senior assembly be like? What words of wisdom will be given to us? Who will makes the speeches?" One day they will reminisce, but for now they look forward to it. Little do they realize what the future holds. Graduation is the end of the easy life and the beginning of a more complex, more difficult life. They can't wait, but for what? If I had those answers, I could be a rich man. But instead, all I can say about the future is simply the series of todays string together. Each day leads us to the future, by ignoring today we are rushing into the future, a future we can not control. Live today, be the best today, it will make for a great future.

As a teacher, I look ahead. I look at Evan, thirteen years from now. Yeah, thirteen years, a long time, but before we know it, it will be here. We will be (hopefully) watching Evan receive recognition for his accomplishments and then seeing him receive his diploma and move on to the next phase of his life. Will we be ready? Will he be ready? I don't know, but what I can be sure of, if we enjoy life one day at a time while preparing for the next, Evan's graduation will be here and we will be ready. Remember to enjoy each day as a gift. Everyday that I get to see the sun rise is a day to be thankful for, another gift to enjoy. And, as I was always told by Grandma Eleanor things are better whenever you share, sharing each day makes it even more enjoyable.

To the seniors everywhere today, enjoy life, one day at a time, and share it with others, it will make your life full and when it is time to look back, you will not have regrets, but instead will have friends to reminisce with.

Good Luck, you never know what tomorrow will bring, be prepared, some of it is good too!

Selling Our Safety - Revisited

2006-04-20T12:37:00.000-05:00

Oh Crap! Why can't things be that easy? Why I didn't think of this before, I don't know. An additional consideration to the nuclear proliferation question is the environment. If we force India to continue to rely on carbon based energy, such as coal, we will continue to damage our environment at a point in time where we are increasingly approaching the "tipping point" in controlling global warming.

An excellent book regarding this topic is The Weather Makers by Tim Flannery. Throughout the book he points out the evidence that our global climate is changing at rates that are unimaginable. The main idea is this, in just a few years (about 8) the world will reach a point in damaging the environment that it will be too late to do anything to correct the damage. In this regard he is specifically referring to the polar icecaps. He points out that ice has a greater albedo than water (that is, reflects more of the sun's rays). Ice reflects about 90% of the sun's energy while water absorbs about 90% of the sun's energy. Since air is not directly heated by the sun but is instead heated by the radiational cooling of the earth's surface, greater absorption of the sun's energy by water will cause a steady increase in global tempertures. He estimates, that at the current rate, enough ice will have melted to creat an irreversible condition where no human efforts at conservation will allow us to reverse the effects. In other words, we will be unable to prevent further melting of the icecaps and eventually we will see no ice at either the north or south pole. The effects are uncountable from changing and more severe weather patterns to extinctions of uncountable numbers of species. All of which would have profound effects on individual and global economies. So basically, either way we are at risk.

And I was worried about the gas prices!

A Good Week

2006-03-24T00:53:00.000-05:00

This has been one hectic week, to say the least. It has been Spirit Week! Faculty and students dresseach day according to specific theme: pajama day, twin day, tacky day, colors day, beach day. Powderpuff football game between the junior and senior girls. Spirit Halls, decorating the hallways by class according to a specific theme: TV networks (CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX). And Carnival, selling pizza at a booth during the Powderpuff game. Oh, lest we forget, it is the last week of the marking quarter, and I leave for Maine in the morning - a well deserved Spring Break is next week!

I tell you what, it has been a load of fun! As one of the advisors for the Class of 2008, I had a blast! The sophomores showed so much spirit and enthusiasm, it was contagious. So despite being at school every day this week until 6 pm, it was fun! I have been so lucky to work with a group of students this year that are determined to win, or at the very least, not lose! The judging of the Spirit Halls was Thursday morning, but the results won't be announced until Friday morning. I am pretty sure we will win that competition, but even if we don't I still had a great time getting to know some great and neat students.

My co-advisors are great too! Having been without a co-advisor, pretty much, for the year, but literally for this semester so far, they volunteered in the nick of time - days before the Spirit Hall construction began. They could not have picked a better time because they got to experience, full force, the class council experience. They are both awesome and I am lucky to work with them and grateful to be alble to get to better know them through this experience!

So after all this, I am looking forwardto getting up before 5am to get on a plane and just sit. Let someone else do the work for a change... pilot to Maine please.

Selling Our Safety

2006-03-02T23:56:00.000-05:00

President Bush will stop at nothing to sell out the United States. He is so blind and so stupid I just can not describe! With Hurricane Katrina our government has proven that it cannot handle an expected disaster, but now, with the agreement with India, the President wants to create situations the will result in unexpected disasters.

Today the President made an agreement with India to sell plans and technology to benefit India's civilian nuclear power program. We must be reminded that India is a country who deifed the world and did not sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and developed nuclear weapons. India has been considered a "Nuclear Pariah". So, as a reward, the United States is going to sell India MORE nuclear technology. Let me see if I follow this logic correctly.

1) A man holds up a bank and is caught. So instead of putting him on trial or even arresting him, we let him keep the money he stole, and then, give him the keys to more banks.
2) A student comes 5 minutes late to class everyday despite the understanding that he will receive detention for doing so. But instead of giving him detention, I actually give him a pass that will allow him to come to class late everyday by 10 minutes with no consequence.
3) My son draws on the wall with crayons, which he knows he will earn a "time-out". But instead of the punishment, I give him more crayons and more colors and sit him in front of a wall he hasn't colored on yet.

So if this is the logic, let me apply it to relevant current event.

1) Iran continues to build its nuclear weapons program. The United States and the United Nations ignore it. And in ten years we actally give them more nuclear technology.
2) North Korea continues to build its nuclear weapons program. The United States and the United Nations ignore it. And in ten years we actally give them more nuclear technology.
3) Sudan....
4) Saudi Arabia....
5) Mexico....

Get the drift?

I remember a time when President Bush called on the United Nations to not become "irrelevant" when it came to Iraq. But what I am really seeing is that all of these world institutions already are irrelevant as long as the United States has a leader that does not give a care about ANYTHING! If there is anyone making the United Nations "irrelevant" it is George W. Bush!

Let's take this further...

From my current understanding, the agreement Mr. Bush made with the Indian Prime Minister will allow India to continue to make 20 nuclear bombs per year and will make India's fast breeder reactors (uranium processing facilities that are used for producing nuclear weapon grade uranium) off-limits to inspectors.

Let us also recall who India was closely tied to during the Cold War... The Soviet Union! So now, all of a sudden, because the Cold War is over and some of our companies have moved their customer service call centers, India is an important ally?

Again I ask you to write your reprsentative and senators and have them tell the President that the security of our nation is NOT FOR SALE!

Listen to news about this event.

Reminisce: Dungeons and Dragons

2006-02-28T20:19:00.000-05:00

Today was the day! Dungeons and Dragons Online was released! No, I didn't run out to get it, but I did hear a review of it today on the radio. It made me think back to sitting around the table and playing the imagination game. I miss playing. Does it make me a loser to want to still play? I don't care, it doesn't matter to me if some does think so. But it would be difficult to round up enough people my age these days to come to gether and spend entire afternoons in a world of fantasy. I guess most of us have more important things to do in the real world. Slaying dragons and finding treasure in the fantasy world kind of gets left behind (In the sort of way Peter Pan becomes Peter Panning in the movie "Hook").

I remember when the first attacks against the game came, family groups and parents condemning it as satanic and its players being more likely to commit violent crime. Well, I don't know about that. But I do know I praised the pencil and paper game (and continue to praise) for giving me something to do with my friends. For hanging out, working together to solve problems, leading, following... You know, things that turn out to be real skills that someone might need in the real world. Sure there was less at stake when your decisions only impacted an imaginary character that existed solely on paper...Or did it?

When playing the game, the charatcers are real. They are your alter ego. Your chance to escape the real world and live in the fantasy world, at least for an afternoon. When that character makes an incredible hit that saves the entire party and discovers an inordinate amount of treasure, you feel elation! You did it! And when that character made a poor choice and ended up as goo after some giant spider stings you, it was crushing. A part of you becomes goo too...Or did it?

But what did we gain and what did we lose in these situations? Time. When we celebrated our victories, we had great times with our friends and companions. When we mourned the loss of our character, we lost all the time we spent building up that character, but gained many great moments together with our friends in the real world while our alter egos went adventuring and spelunking in the fantasy world.

Dungeons and Dragons...thank you for bringing me closer to my friends...even if it did cost me some popularity and some dates growing up.

Hang it up! Please!

2006-02-23T11:28:00.000-05:00

Enough already! Please do us a favor, RETIRE! I am so sick of hearing about these two guys. Ricky, go get high in some doorway somewhere, but keep out of the NFL. Barry, take your bad attitude somewhere else. The two of you are giving your sports a bad name. Ricky Williams is simply a joke at this point. If you don't want to play, then don't. Get a job like everyone else and go sulk over the awesome career you through away. Barry Bonds is so selfish, I hope he NEVER breaks another record. In fact, I hope he gets injured again, when he is 1 homerum shy of Babe Ruth, so that he will always be reminded of what happens when you don't take care of your body and inject it with steroids. It is a very sad thing that men with so much talent and with the potential to do so much for their respective sports will do the exact opposite.

And what about their teams? (That's right, take a look at the word T-E-A-M, I still don't see the letter 'I') Analysts are predicting the SF Giants to win the west if Bonds can stay healthy. Hey! Wake up! Note to the Giants, he doesn't care if they win the division, all he wants is to pass Ruth on the HR list. Look Bonds, you said that you don't enjoy the game any more. Then why do something you don't enjoy? Are you just trying to prove to yourself that you can still hit homeruns? Look, most of the rest of us don't care if you can hit HRs any more because you are NOT steroid free, no matter what you say. I am going out n a limb here, if Bonds should be lucky enough to stay injury free to hit 10 more homeruns and pass Babe Ruth, he might retire there on the spot. One more question for you Barry, why not go for the all time record and break Hank Aaron's record? Surely you have 48 more in you? I have a guess, but I won't say, I am not as bigoted as you.

Ricky, good job. You have single handedly put the Miami Dolphins in the cellar, AGAIN. You are like the relative that the family counts on to bring the plates to the picnic and then doesn't show up. They need you, drug free! Ever since your departure, the team has been trying to rediscover its running game. Look, I'm no Dolphin fan, but you are making a mockery of the league.

So to Bonds and Williams, do your respective sports a favor, retire.

The Price of Freedom...

2006-01-31T18:04:00.000-05:00

...is eternal vigilance.

Throughout history, people have had to protect themselves, first and foremost, from their own government. Our nation was founded on the principle of the citizen as soverign. The powers of government were divided among the three branches to protect against an abuse of power by one branch or another. Today, the republicans have taken another step toward breaking down these barriers by confirming Sam Alito to the Supreme Court.

Today's swearing in coincides with another tragic event, the passing of Coretta Scott King. After the death of her husband in 1968, Mrs. King carried on the wrk of her husband to end poverty, bring peace, and break down racial barriers. Her work included denouncing war and protected the rights of American citizens, regardless of their ethnicity.

But her passing reminds us that we must be vigilant to carry the banner of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Coretta Scott King, to continue to fight to protect our rights. Alito has a record of deciding on the side of expanding presidential powers at the expense of personal liberties. Presently, the President has ordered and initiated the illegal wiretapping of American citizens telephone and the Justice Department continues to fight for access to Google's search records. This amounts to warrantless searches, a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution.

As per the 1944 Supreme Court Case, Korematsu vs. United States, the premise is that in a time of war individual liberties may be curtailed. The right to privacy may be limited in the name of national safety. But the rules have changed. The adminstration admits that this is a differnt type of war. This is a war against a faceless foe. A war that could carry on in perpetuity. This is an Orwellian war, one that must continually be engaged to keep Americans safe. Without knowing specifically who the enemy is, assuming that terror will be ever present, this war will go on without end and likewise will the new restrictions on our personal liberties.

It is our responsibilities as citizens to demand our rights be protected. That, at the very least, the Constitution of the United States be upheld. Activism at all levels is at risk. Continued surveillance of private citizens will cause citizens to become more apathetic. The fear of being involved in what might be a group under surveillance will cause fewer people to be involved in activism. This may not sound like much, but if people were afraid to protest based on government intrusion, then what would have happened what Martin Luther King, Jr. marched on Washington? Would there have even been a crowd? The point is, people will be afraid to exercise their First Amendment rights if their Fourth Amendment protections are limited. As citizens of the Unied States, we have more than a responsibility, we have a duty to be watchdogs for our government. Write your representative and senator, let them know you stand for the Constitution and ALL its rights and protections - war or no war!

Find your representative or senator.

Don't Be So Surprised

2006-01-26T17:41:00.000-05:00

"Hamas Captures Landslide Parliamentary Win"

Why is everyone so surprised? What did everyone expect? The people of Palestine have been treated poorly for generations, by the international community, Israel, even their own leadership. Now that the people of Palestine have been given the opportunity to voice their opinion through their own vote, did you think they would choose to vote for people that would continue to go along with their poor treatment?

We are at a crossroads. This is a very important time in history. What will happen next? A unique opportunity is in front of the leaders of the world. This vote is a demand by the Palestinians to be taken seriously in the international arena. No matter what governments are saying "we refuse to deal with governments that support terror" they are going to have to if any Middle East peace is desired. Israel's acting president refuses to have any negotiations with a Palestinian government controlled by Hamas. This is truly a mistake. The Palestinians are in a position where they almost have to negotiate for successful peace. Although Hamas has stood on a platform that includes the elimination of the Israeli state, how can they legitimately push for this end? They have not been above the genocide of the Jewish population. But now, as a ruling party in a government that wants to be viewed as legitimate, they cannot pursue this policy. Compromise must be made.

The United States has also been backed into a corner. The US has stood on a platform of not negotiating with terrorists. In order to see any progress in the Palestine / Israeli situation the United States must work with the Hamas led Palestnian government. Remember, these elections were the result of US driven policy of promoting democracy in the Middle East, that was also supported by Israel.

The Palestinians, many of whom, including the members of the new government, were surprised by the huge margin of victory, now have a huge responsibility. They have been entrusted by their people to bring positive changes to their conditions. Positive changes are not increases in terrorism, but increases in peace and negotiations. Hamas probably was looking to win seat in a new government in Palestine that expected to be run by Fateh in order to be able to pressure government to look out for the interests of Palestinians. Now they have the task of fostering those negotiations, not preventing them. The people of Palestine want peace, just like anyone else.

This victory by Hamas should be viewed as a positive event. If change is truly what the people of the world want, this is the time. Welcome the Palestinians. Grant them equal respect in the world, not as second class citizens of the Middle East. If the new government of Palestine is welcomed it is likely that they will respond positively. They will sit at the table of negotiations with dignity and the respect of other world leaders. If the new government is shunned, they will be more likely to increase violence. Were do we want this to go? Only time will tell if this will turn out positively or not, but it has the potential to go both ways. If things do not go well, we are in for a lot more problems - any problem that arises over this in Palestine will spill over into problems with other Arab states.

Remember, terrorism is war by other means. It is the tool used by people without political power. Hamas now political power. I see no choice but for it to become legitimate.

Music With Meaning (vol. 1)

2006-01-20T20:42:00.000-05:00

Music is one of those things that spark emotions: excitement, nostalgia, joy, sadness. What is it about music that can do that to us? I think it hits multiple senses. When a song really hits you it is because you hear it, it brings back memories, sights, smells, and feelings. Makes you think about the past, or maybe the future. Sometimes the same song that hits you might not even spark a second look by someone else.

"100 Years" by Five for Fighting is one of those songs that just caught me. I first heard it on ESPN, I was 33 (significant in the song). A couple of years back ESPN was filling in space on their Sportscenter by showcasing artists and their music. This song could easily be applied when reflecting on a sports career, and the group's name definately adds the sports flair. But when I heard it, I knew I had to hear it again. The music is simple. Piano solo to open with a simple melody. A slow, methodical, lamenting melody. Next the vocals, also lamenting. Reflective. Enter a subtle drum beat. Build in strength both the piano and the vocals. Reflective of one's understanding of their life. Confidence growing, a sense of duty, and marching on. Yet learning that things are passing by. Noticing that life is becoming more complicated, just like the music. Building to a climax that dimishes some before a final last gasp and crescendo. And then, falling again, to simple piano and fade.

"100 Years"

by Five for Fighting

I'm 15 for a moment

Caught in between 10 and 20

And I'm just dreaming

Counting the ways to where you are

I'm 22 for a moment

She feels better than ever

And we're on fire

Making our way back from Mars

15 there's still time for you

Time to buy and time to lose

15, there's never a wish better than this

When you only got 100 years to live

I'm 33 for a moment

Still the man, but you see I'm of age

A kid on the way

A family on my mind

I'm 45 for a moment

The sea is high

And I'm heading into a crisis

Chasing the years of my life

15 there's still time for you

Time to buy, Time to lose yourself

Within a morning star

15 I'm all right with you

15, there's never a wish better than this

When you only got 100 years to live

Half time goes by

Suddenly you’re wise

Another blink of an eye

67 is gone

The sun is getting high

We're moving on...

I'm 99 for a moment

Dying for just another moment

And I'm just dreaming

Counting the ways to where you are

15 there's still time for you

22 I feel her too

33 you’re on your way

Every day's a new day...

15 there's still time for you

Time to buy and time to choose

Hey 15, there's never a wish better than this

When you only got 100 years to live

If you have heard this song and not taken a moment to think about the words. It is heartbreaking. Yet it is hopeful. To me, I look back, I look ahead.

15. I remember handball at Bayview Ave., riding a bicycle where ever I needed to go, Young People's Day Camp, Dwight Gooden, Darryl Strawberry, Keith Hernandez, Wally Backman, Gary Carter, and so on, pickup football games at Milburn, crushes on girls that really crushed my heart, wanting more, wanting to be older.

22. Queens College, trying to hold on to the past as it was and reconciling it with the new present and unknown future, FoodTown, "Drivers' Ed" Mobile, substitute teaching at FHS (and my first substantial paychecks), creating a future in my mind that never included anything but living on Long Island, feeling at the "top of my game" - invincible.

33. Evan, Michelle, Leesville Road High School and my students, hours of time spent at on home on work and not family, piling bills and debt, a leaking roof and more leaves than I know what to do with, Grandma Eleanor & Aunt Aggie in my memory, acknowlging my own mortality.

What about 45? 50? 67? 99? One thing if for sure, nothing was as sweet as 15. The whole world in front of us and not seeing it. Only until it hits us do we notice, and sometimes, not until after it passes us by. How cliche, but what I wouldn't give to be 15 again and understand whatI know now. And I am sure, at 50 I'll wish for 35 and understand what I will know then but only at 35. A good quote, or perhaps a paraphrase:

"Life can only be understood backwards, but must be lived forwards"

New Year's Resolution

2006-01-08T10:19:00.000-05:00

Promises, promises, promises. Every year I make a resolution: "this year I will lose 40 pounds by my birthday," "I will be a better father," "I will be a better husband," "I will finish all home projects in a timely manner," and so on. Well, I have had to break the 40 pound promise, my birthday comes too soon - only 4 months, that's 10 pounds a month, short of going on a starvation strike until Bush is impeached, 40 pounds "ain't happenin'"! Finishing projects in a timely manner? Problem, its WORK! I work all week the last thing I want to do on the weekend is work ALL weekend. Besides, if I want to be a better husband and father, I won't have time to finish all my projects in a timely manner. So where do we go from here?

I would like to make a motion. Let's end these specific, so called New Year's Resolutions. All I hear when I hear the word "Resolution" is "lie" or "broken promise." I can't get out of my head "My resolve has never been stronger..." Thanks Mr. Bush for screwing up another perfectly good word.

Instead, let's not make promises, lets just be more observant of ourselves and try to improve on what we don't like, which is what we should be doing anyway. No promises. No guarantees. But at least let us be wise enough to know that each of us are not perfect and that we ALL have room for improvement.

So to everyone, Happy New Year. And remember, for better or worse, I'm thinkin' of ya.

Oh and by the way, here are a couple of links you might find funny regarding New Year's.

From JibJab: 2-0-5 in Review
From NPR: 2006 Trailer

Bible Thumper or Bible Stumper?

2005-12-30T11:21:00.000-05:00

I was out surfing the web the other day and came across this little bit. You may have seen ones similar, but I enjoyed this. Makes me wonder about all those Bible Thumpers out there. It reaffirms my belief that Bible Thumper = hypocrite.

I know, this is probably not the time of year to post about religion being Hanukkah and Christmas season and all, but I think, what better time than to catch people while they are reflecting on their beliefs to challenge them?

Laura Schlessinger is a US radio personality, who dispenses advice to people who call in to her Radio show. On her radio show recently, she said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination, according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura.

Dear Dr. Laura,

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination ... End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.

1) Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
2) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
3) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrul uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
4) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord -Lev.1:9. The problem is, my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
5) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2. clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?
6) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination - Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?
7) Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?
8) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
9) I know from Lev.11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
10) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Get A Job!

2005-12-13T13:34:00.000-05:00

This may seem odd coming from a public high school teacher, but that's ok, I teach odd people. My question is simple, the answer, not so much.

Q: Should students be required to come to public high school?

From my observations, No. Look, I teach three classes a semester. This semester I am fortunate to teach a Honors World History class from Heaven 1st period, an AP Economics Class from Earth 3rd period, but in between, I have an Average World History Class from Hell. Not that every student in the class is a problem, on the contrary, only a select few seem to be tests sent to me by the gods. I am not the only one in the class being tested however, the students trying to learn the subject material are also being tested. I don't mean by me at the end of a chapter or unit, they are being tested by the other students who are not at school to learn. The distractions created by the, shall we say, non-academically motivated students make it more difficult for the rest of the students to concentrate and learn. In short, at this point in the semester, I feel that the students who don't care about the class, the curriculum, the course, their education, their peers should go some place else. That's right, GET A JOB! GET OUT OF MY CLASSROOM! LET ME DO MY JOB! LET THE STUDENTS WHO CARE, GET AN EDUCATION!

Ok, maybe I am overstating my arguement. I mean, I have at least one kid in the class who is working at school. In fact, it has a good chance of making more money than I do. All day long he gets to see his clientele in class, in the halls, during lunch, and on the bus. Basically, he works the same number of hours I do, and makes more money based on the more he pushes. In fact, the suspicion is that he is higher up in the supply chain this year than last year. (And by the way, he is presently passing the class - its his 4th time taking the course however). I guess that means he is not only making money off what he sells, he is also making money off what others sell. ( I wonder if I could get a cut of all my students' income each time they use what I taught them?) Not bad. He has buyers - On Demand! It an "On Demand Wolrd" these days. He's got customers who are required by law to come to him (well, come to school at least, which is where he is).

You know, now that I think about it, I have at least one other kid in the class who is getting an education outside of the books. Yeah, that's right, they are. I see them talking with the girls, writing letters to girls, in fact, I'm sure some of the things they do could considered harassment - yeah, so I guess they are working too.

Hmm, let's see. Drug Dealers, Pimps, anything else...?

Alright then, Drug Dealers and Pimps aside, since, obviously, they do have a good reason for being at school, what about the rest? Do I really want them to be out of school? What if they can't find a job? You know, there can be just so many fry-clerks at the well respected fast-food establishments. What would they be doing? Selling Drugs? Pimpin'? Robbery? Mischief & Mayhem? On the street, they would never get ahead.

Ok, ok. You talked me into it. You convinced me. They all should still be at school. It is still the best place to get an education, even if it is not in reading, writing, and arithmatic.

A: Yes.

Christmas or Communism?

2005-11-30T16:54:00.000-05:00

Ok, here is the dilemma. What are we going to do with political correctness and the "holidays"? I don't have an answer and I am not sure how I feel about it. Today, the Reverend Jerry Falwell and Christian Conservatives (don't get me started on that whole elitist minority) protested and ridiculed the Cityof Boston for renaming it's Christmas Tree a "Holiday Tree." I undertsand, they are entitled to their opinion, but what is really going on here? Where will this controversy end? Let's look at some of the alternatives.

1) If Boston, and other municipalities erect "Holiday Trees" they are showing that they are embracing many different traditions and cultures, even though those other cultures many not celebrate their holidays via a tree. By doing this, they face criticism from Christian Conservative groups (I prefer "Bible Thumping, war-monging, hate breeding, Elitists", but that is just my name for them).

2) If Boston, and other municipalities erect "Christmas Trees" they are opening themselves to criticism from other groups and cultures. They may even face lawsuits because they will be using tax-payer dollars (including taxes from peope who do not celebrate Christmas) to in some way finance this tree. (Yes, I know this tree was donated. But who foots the power bill for keeping the tree lit? Is it public land that this tree will be on?)

3) If Boston, and other municipalities erect "Christmas Trees" and equally brazen symbols of different holiday celebration of various cultures and religions, then the expenses will mount exponentially. Not to mention the law-suits that will be filed by all he groups who may oppose one or more of the religions, or who do not celebrate any of these cultural holidays.

A missing alternative... Communism! That's right, you heard me, Communism! Why don't we force our government to become like Communist nations with regard to religion and holidays? Take China, for example. Religoin is outlawed. The idea is that if people are devoted to religion or God, or gods, then they are not fully devoted to the well being of the state. Therefore, no symbols, no celebrations, no holidays, and DEFINATELY no "Trees": Christmas, Holiday, or otherwise. In this way, nobody is offended by any act of compromise of religion because there won't be any to complain about. Is that what we want?

What is the answer? I don't have one, and lucky for me, I don't have to have one. I haven't been elected to make such a decision. But if we want to become a culturally sterile society, let's go ahead and complain and sue our government at all levels when they try to compromise. Remember, this nation, which can still be a great nation, was founded by compromise. Compromise shows that we are trying to work together. When one group or another attmepts to force their views and beliefs on everyone, we don't have compromise, we tyranny. Oh yeah, remember tyranny, that little thing that our Constitution was designed to prevent? The little thing that inspired our founding fathers to write the Declaration of Independence?

So when Jerry Falwell, or anyone for that matter, speaks out and criticizes the government for trying to compromise and bridge the gaps in our society that have grown since 2001 (you might think I mean 9/11, nah, I mean the inauguration of George "W" Bush - remember the guy who claimed that God spoke to him, and then we reelected him? - yeah, in my job, if I claimed God spoke to me, I would probably be fired for forcing religion on my students and then be forced to seek psychiatric help for hearing voices), we get to see who the true tyrants are.

Happy Thanksgiving!

2005-11-25T00:42:00.000-05:00

Happy Thanksgiving! Especially to everyone who is reading this. We had wonderful Thanksgiving dinner at Carroll and Jim's house. A huge spread, way too much food for the number of people. . . just the way it is supposed to be! And all of it delicious. It was small gathering, Carroll and jim, myself, Michelle and Evan and our friend Scott. After dinner Melinda arrived, she first had dinner with her family and drove back to see us. After dinner, we watched the Polar Express, Charlie Brown Thanksgiving, and came home. Very nice, despite my sinus headache and sore neck.

Even though it was a nice, small, quiet gathering, our families were missed. Families, everyone: Moms and Dads, Brothers, Sisters, Grandparents (yes all of them, even though it may not be possible to be with most of them right now), Aunts, Uncles, and Cousins. It has been a while, we love you all and miss you all. You are in our hearts all the time. But family also includes our dearest friends, both here and afar: Prescotts, Nadiaks, D'Atenos, Birnies, Haas, Ketchels, Toms, Hicks, Antonellas. You see, family is more than just the family you were born into, but the family that you have grown into. We are thankful today for all of you. We may not say it all the time, maybe we don't call enough or email or wirte enough, but that doesn't mean we aren't thinking about you. Thank you everyone.

Evan and Michelle, I am most thankful for the two of you. Without either of you, I don't know where I would be or what my life would be like; I don't even want to spend any time trying to figure it out. I love the two of you with all of my heart. Everything I do, it is for you. Thank you so much for being you and being there for me.

I love you all.

Matt

ADDENDUM:
It has been brought to my attention, that I was amiss to leave out another important family from our extended family. It was truly unintentional, they mean a great deal to me and my immediate family. The Wheelers too are part of our family. I know, as is true of all the people I mention here, that we all would be there for each other if any of us so much as hinted we need help. It may be 3+ months after Thanksgiving, but guess what? I still love ya all! (March 7, 2006)

Hurricane Katrina

2005-09-04T11:15:00.000-05:00

I can not imagine the death and destruction that Hurricane Katrina inflicted on the families of the Gulf Coast. To lose one's home and, even worse, memories is something that I don't wish on anyone, not even my worst enemy (unless my worst enemy is Osama bin Laden, then, yes, it could happen to him). My thought and hopes go out to everyone involved for as speedy recovery and rebuilding as possible. However, I suspect that they will be picking up the piece for a VERY long time. I suspect more than 5 years to fully rebuild New Orleans and Biloxi. From North Carolina's experience, there are towns still rebuilding down east from hurricanes that passed through 2 years ago.

But let me take te opportunity to complain about something here. It isn't the direct impact on gas prices that has me down (though maybe a little bit). I put the whole situation in perspective. I refuse to truly complain about gas prices. I can pay $3.29 per gallon (which our President assures us is temporary), especially when I think about all those people in New Orleans and Biloxi. I'm sure all those people would be "happy" to pay that price for gas because it would mean that they still had places to go, they had jobs, places to shop, eat, home to travel to and from. So I am grateful that I have all those things and am able to pay the gas prices.

My biggest complaint is, of course, with government. Not necessarily this administration, but many past administration who did very little to prevent these gas prices. Decades ago there were fuel crises. Long lines, rationing, high prices. It has been over 30 years since it was a clear reality that prices of oil will be controlled by forces outside our control and that one day, we WILL run out of fossil fuels. My question: How long will it take to develop reliable alternative fuel sources?!?! Where has the earnest investment in these alternative sources? In one of his state of the union addresses, the present President Bush wanted to spend what seemed like a ridiculous amount of money developing new types of engines for automobiles that will not be reliant on gasoline. This was actually the ONE thing that President Bush said hat I actually liked (I try to find something else he said that I liked and since it is taking too much time, I decided that there probably isn't anything). Had previous presidents made commitments to alternative fuel sources maybe we wouldn't be in such a fuel pinch and still "slaves" to the Middle East. If we didn't need oil related product, the US would be less involved in the Middle East, which, of course, would result in an entirely different world today! (For better or worse, I am not sure, but I have a guess).

I think I know the reason why such an earnest investment in alternative fuel sources has not been undertaken: $$MONEY$$. Fuel companies mke a killing, no matter what the price, because people have no alternatives to their sources of power. "They have us by the balls." Economically speaking, gasoline is inelastic, meaning that a change in price will result in a relatively small change in the demand. As a result, fuel companies incomes are guaranteed beacuse we still have to buy their product, there are no substitutes. And with this secured income, money is spent on supporting presidential campaigns for candidates least likely to push the alternative fuel solution. In fact, follow the logic here, they are the one more likely to push for war on oil producing countries. By fighting a war there are several benefits to the oil companies: (1) the government must buy more fel to fight the war (2) the possibility of victory will make it easier for US petroleum companies to operate in these foreign countries, thus lowering costs, which does NOT translate into lower prices at the pumps (they keep the same prices resulting in greater profits!).

But there is more! Before Hurricane Katrina, the price of crude was rising, and so was the price at the pump. And as the consumer was cringing each day as they drove past the gas station, the investors were livin' large! Since gasoline is inelastic with no substitute, investors in oil companies on the stock market were raking in the (potential) money. "Buy low and sell high" is the motto for market speculators who are seeing a higher and higher prices. What is more, President Bush, where did his family get a good deal of their wealth? (Here's a hint, for generations his relatives have not been pushing for alternative fuel sources). Oh well, I guess the only way to get ahead in this country is "lie, cheat and steal" from the working class who have no choice but to buy gasoline.

Sure looks like there is something wrong with the system.

Summer is over

2005-08-19T20:47:00.000-05:00

Well, it's back to school. Back to school is always filled with mixed emotions: excitement to get the year going with a clean slate, anxiety for waiting to meet the students the first day and to find out who will be the "good" students and who will be the troublemakers, sadness for not being able to spend my entire day with Evan. But as I look back on this past summer, I can definitely say, I had a lot of fun. Probably more fun than any summer since I started teaching. We got to do so much: Disney World, Atlanta to see Kim, Jeff and the kids, to the beach to see Doug and his family, to New York to visit with Mom and Dad and attend an AP Summer Institute for AP Econ, and finally to the beach to see Carroll and Jim's wedding. (Oh yeah, I can't leave out Jim's bachelor party as a fun event too. How much of it do you remember Jim?)

Most summers, at least since Evan has been born, I would return to school feeling down that I didn't do anything exciting or eventful with Evan. That has definitely NOT been the case this summer! I am definitely going to miss spending all my time with Evan, but he is excited to be going back to school. He wants to play with all his friends there. Yes, I can play with him, but I can't play with him the same way other 4 years old can.

I am glad for the time we have together. But I am also glad that he can go and play and grow with other kids his age. I wonder what exciting things we will plan for next summer, his last before going to kindergarten!

Nostalgia

2005-07-11T23:15:00.000-05:00

Wow. Disney World is big, busy, and tiring, but definately worth it! It's not about me, its about Evan. Seeing his face light up is the best feeling in the world. His initial reactions are priceless. It did take him a couple of days to get used to how busy things would be, but once he did, he started knowing what he wanted to do and helping to make the plans.
The truth about Disney World is that it is a bit tacky. Loud, cheezy, long lines, but what it can offer to overcome all these is nostalgia. My first trip was in 1980 (I went again in '81, '88, '89, and 2002). Did I have fun all those times, but they are trips you never forget. And then to see what Evan is experiencing for the first time, helps bring back the memories and the youth. It also helped to see my parents enjoying it all over again with Evan. To live vicariously through those younger than us is like drinking from the fountain of youth, especially when they are doing something we remember as being so enjoyable. Would I do it again? Definately. (I would live in Disney World - on Main Street - if I could!)